Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
7,705 posts
ConsRule » 22 Feb 2023, 9:05 am » wrote: ↑
That would depend on how someone presents the other person. If they are making the claim the person they are agreeing with/quoting/referring to is a recognized scholar on the subject, be it any field of science, economic issues, the Constitution, etc., then cherry picking their positions in that subject matter is hypocritical (IMO).
So... you are saying that one cannot look back at the entire judicial record of an appellate judge and agree with some of their decisions and disagree with others? If we think they were right about ANY ruling, we must buy into their decisions on EVERY ruling?
Is that your final answer?