Child Groomer, Sexual Predator
7,705 posts
THIS
IS EXACTLY what you said:
"If they are making the claim the person they are agreeing with/quoting/referring to is a recognized scholar on the subject, be it any field of science, economic issues, the Constitution, etc., then cherry picking their positions in that subject matter is hypocritical."
I, therefore, must agree with all of the judge's positions on the constitution and if I don't, and I refer to any of his positions about any constitutional issue - even ones where I am in agreement with him, I am being hypocritical.
Again...is that your final answer?