12 Jan 2023 8:37 am
A. You have no idea what locations President Obama may have authorized his Vice President to take classified documents to. Neither do I.Beekeeper » 12 Jan 2023, 6:10 am » wrote: ↑ A. Yes there is, apologist!! It was not an AUTHORIZED LOCATION that you boy had them in!! THAT is one of the ILLEGAL PARTS, doofarse. The first was removing them in the first place from Government Property. It's also known as stealing.
B. Once the PRESIDENT declassifies ANYTHING, regardless of it's content, it's available for PUBLIC INSPECTION regardless of what's in it. THAT happens to be his CONSTITUTIONAL AUTHORITY TO DECLASSIFY AS HE DESIRES and by any means he wishes. How hard is that for YOU to comprehend?? You keep going back to this same BS "rebuttal" after it''s been PROVEN you are wrong in your assumptions. OBTUSE IDIOTS use this kind of "debating tactic" when they are LOSING AND HAVE LOST!!
In fact, couldn't President Obama say, today, that he had actually remembers declassifying those documents "in his mind" at the time? That was the excuse given by the clown! jk
B. And if it turned out that the outgoing president declassified a document, made it available for public inspection, and its disclosure was adjudged to have been used for the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, the outgoing president is guilty of violating the Espionage Act of 1917, which was written long before the entire process of classifying/declassifying documents was even created.