8 Sep 2024 6:54 am
Cannonpointer » 07 Sep 2024, 11:35 pm » wrote: ↑ Title 22, §1508
This law establishes a rebuttable presumption of validity for a minor's written consent to gender-affirming hormone therapy. This means that a parent or guardian cannot take action against a provider who provides gender-affirming hormone therapy without their consent.
Pretty sure a state that allows people to grant sexual agency to children and protects them from those children's parents has SOME democ rat pedophiles or endorsers of pedophilia, kid. I am pretty sure that granting sexual agency to children is a pretty big agenda item for NAMBLA. Would you concur?
Allowing minors access to gender-affirming hormones (not surgery) is not synonymous with pedophilia.