16 Sep 2024 10:49 am
Every court? Even the ones with Trump-appointed judges?Zeets2 » 16 Sep 2024, 9:18 am » wrote: ↑ Hey stupid!
How would the judge know what was in 5 BINDERS OF EVIDENCE if he refused to hear the case? In every court, the fix was in and the judges refused to hear it.
So, in your opinion the buck doesn't stop with the person the president puts in charge of "stemming the flow of illegals", but with a traitorous flunky puppet that was put in charge in order to take the slings and arrows for Kamala.
I see, so you claim to SUPPORT the border patrol and the courts vetting the illegals, but you're ready to commit to another 4 years of the same idiots that have allowed tens of millions of illegals to come in UNVETTED by voting for Kamala, don't you?
That kind of inconsistency makes you a typical lying liberal! And an ignorant one at that!
No judge "refused to hear the cases"; they just summarily dismissed them after opening arguments because Team Kraken, who had the burden of proof, failed to proffer sufficient evidence to carry that burden. BECAUSE OPINIONS AIN'T PROOF. ANOMALIES AIN'T PROOF. PROOF IS PROOF. ANd Rudy's binders didn't have any of THAT.
https://campaignlegal.org/results-lawsu ... -elections
Harris had nothing to do with the border. Her task was narrowly defined as working with Central American governments to find solutions to the root causes of the northern diaspora.
Trump stopped comprehensive bipartisan border reform legislation that was endorsed by the Border Patrol. He put his own political aspirations above the country. Harris will sign it on day one.