User avatar
SJConspirator
11 Sep 2022 4:08 pm
11 Sep 2022 4:08 pm
User avatar
     
2,084 posts
DeezerShoove » 11 Sep 2022, 3:37 pm » wrote: ↑ A "conspiracy" to kill a single disliked man in an open convertible . . . plausible.
Just need a soon-to-be-murdered patsy and snipers.

Dropping buildings with fully fueled jets piloted by zealot hijackers . . . plausible.
What's so hard to believe about the weight of the floors above overloading structural supports?
The towers were basically hollow tubes with suspended baffles.

Seeking coincidences to discern a "plan" out of chaos is not hard if you look hard enough.

In the movie "Pi", the old man says words to the effect:
"216 is just a number. You can find it everywhere if you look for it.
216 steps to the corner. 216 seconds on the elevator..."

https://youtu.be/d1IzNKIHhp0

----

Kennedy's assassination has a HUGE question of motive. 
Did a small asshole or Kennedy's "workmates" have more motive? Fishy, fishy...

The Twin Towers has motives as well but is WAY more complicated, lots more evidence to cover up, international in scope, previous bombing, etc.
What was the motive behind the "inside job"?


thousands of skyscrapers have been engulfed in flames .  None of them collapsed like that before 9/11.

Here is one in Italy that burned for 3 days, never collapsed

Image
 

 
Updated less than a minute ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search