2 Nov 2022 10:34 am
Outlawing drugs did nothing to stave off the opioid epidemic. The Sacklers made fortunes as they addicted and killed million of people.Skans » 02 Nov 2022, 9:53 am » wrote: ↑ When it comes to recreational drugs, I do see an overriding reason to prohibit this. Let me ask you this - do you really believe that meth and fentanyl are the "height" of addictive drugs? Do you think that's the worst we have seen or will have to deal with? Let me be **** clear about this - it's not! You haven't seen the tip of the iceberg when it comes to what the chemists will be developing to addict and control huge populations. You haven't seen **** when it comes to what China, Iran, N. Korea, Russia even perhaps the US is working on that can instantaneously addict, kill or control large populations at a time.
In a society where drugs are forbidden, it will be much harder to get that society addicted and controlled by chemicals than in a society that has already primed to accept and embrace recreational drug use. Dopers are obviously blind to this. Low and some average IQ people are also blind to this. Why are you so stupidly blind to this?
Big pharma is more dangerous than street dealers and cartels, I agree with that much