roadkill » 24 Nov 2022, 8:54 pm » wrote: ↑
Would it be subject to government smooth talk and adjustments to take us back to where we were in the first place? Cause we all know the gov. wants a significant slice of the pie to keep their own interests intact.
You did say " in theory it would replace all other taxes". Should I assume "in theory" there would be no guarantee of that?
And is there the usual "the devil is in the details"?
I just read this and it's a lot to digest because we both know often times things don't go as planned.
I just read the first page of this. I'm heading to bed soon so I can't effectively digest all of it especially cause it's new to me.
https://taxjustice.net/cms/upload/pdf/g ... nd_tax.pdf
this is all I wanted, was for you to investigate the concept for 5 minutes.
if you still hate LVT and Geoism, you can **** all over it now and I won’t blame you, cuz at least you KNOW what it is your **** on lol.
And the devil is in the details. And LVT has not always worked. Hong Kong did great with it for 50 years, but in the last 10 years they made a mess of it IMO