Liberal Forum

Cannonpointer » 18 Jul 2022, 8:19 pm » wrote: ↑

18 Jul 2022, 8:19 pm

The real problems kick in when a woman who used to be a man gets a man who used to be a woman pregnant. For starters, at least one of them is queer - though they might be double queer, which might translate to hetero, depending on the linguist chosen to suss the issues pertaining to the pregnancy. It would have to be a linguist, wouldn't it?  I mean, there's no **** way we can put a biologist on this ****. The hard sciences aren't competent to deal with the spiel world. We need a wokester. 

Anyway, would the pregnant man who was born female retain the sacred female prerogative? And if so, isn't that dead-naming and bigoted and wrong pronouny? Shouldn't the woman who got him pregnant have a say? And if not, are we saying she isn't a woman, just because she has a dick? Isn't that also bigoted and wrong pronouny?

We need someone with the wisdom of Red Skelton for this gig.