Liberal Forum

Termin8tor » 05 Mar 2020 6:10 pm » wrote:
:

Except that Mueller said he agreed with Barr's conclusions, wackjob.

Then why did Mueller write a letter to Barr complaining that he MISREPRESENTED his report?

https://www.vox.com/2019/4/30/18524663/mueller-barr-letter-trump-russia

Mueller to Attorney General Barr: You “did not fully capture” my report
For the soft-spoken special counsel, that is quite the statement.

It turns out that special counsel Robert Mueller was just as upset with Attorney General William Barr’s characterization of the Trump-Russia report — and the ensuing public discussion — as many Americans were.
On March 24, Barr released his four-page summary of the special counsel’s report in which he said Mueller found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. And while Mueller didn’t absolve President Donald Trump of an obstruction of justice charge, Barr did, saying he didn’t think the evidence the special counsel’s team provided met that standard.
But according to multiple reports, Mueller was unhappy with Barr’s synopsis, and the type of media coverage that synopsis prompted.
Days after the attorney general sent his summary to Congress, Mueller wrote the Justice Department leadership to say that Barr’s letter “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the full report.
“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. This threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations,” he continued. To rectify the situation, Mueller recommended that Barr release the full 448-page report’s introduction and executive summaries.
https://www.justsecurity.org/64441/a-side-by-side-comparison-of-barrs-vs-muellers-statements-about-special-counsel-report/

A Side-by-Side Comparison of Barr’s vs. Mueller’s Statements about Special Counsel Report

Comparison of Attorney General William Barr’s and Special Counsel Robert Mueller’s
Statements about Special Counsel Report
1. Evidence of conspiracy
Added analysis:
Mueller’s statement is more explicit, in some respects, than what’s in the Report. He states that the bottom-line conclusion in Volume 1 is that there was “insufficient evidence” to bring a charge for conspiring with the Russians. That’s also very different from any suggestion that the
investigation found “no evidence,” or that allegations against the president were proven false, or that the conspiracy with Trump campaign associates did not occur. What’s more, Mueller frames the issue importantly in terms of insufficient evidence to charge “a broader conspiracy.” That’s a significant way of framing the investigation’s scope and findings.

Mueller

“The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was

Barr (1) “f the president is being falsely accused, which the evidence now suggests that the accusations against him were false
….”



This is an entire article about how Muellers PUbLIC STATEMENTS contradict what Barr has said often DIRECTLY


Has Mueller expressed one single word of dissent in the many, many months since then?

YES a BUNCH as that ENTIRE ARTICLE SHOWS LIAR

Imbecile.

Is is perfect irony that someone as STAGGERINGLY STUPID as you questions anyone else's intellect MORON besides the FACT you are a PROVEN LIAR a PROVEN GUTLESS COWARD and a TRAITOR