7 Mar 2020 2:47 pm
You are a GUTLESS COWARD who is trying to do a GISH GALLOP while RUNNING AWAY from the FACTS SOBBING. Telling the SAME STUPID LIES OVER AND OVER WORD FOR WORD. ALREADY SEEN them deleted them meanwhile the FACTS ARE Barr misprepresented Muellers report which he SAID in his letter and the FACTS are not going away
Then why did Mueller write a letter to Barr complaining that he MISREPRESENTED his report?
https://www.vox.com/2019/4/30/18524663/mueller-barr-letter-trump-russiaMueller to Attorney General Barr: You “did not fully capture” my reportFor the soft-spoken special counsel, that is quite the statement.It turns out that special counsel Robert Mueller was just as upset with Attorney General William Barr’s characterization of the Trump-Russia report — and the ensuing public discussion — as many Americans were.
On March 24, Barr released his
four-page summary of the special counsel’s report in which he said Mueller found no evidence of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. And while Mueller didn’t absolve President Donald Trump of an obstruction of justice charge, Barr did, saying he didn’t think the evidence the special counsel’s team provided met that standard.But according to
multiple
reports, Mueller was unhappy with Barr’s synopsis, and the type of media coverage that synopsis prompted.Days after the attorney general sent his summary to Congress,
Mueller wrote the Justice Department leadership to say that Barr’s letter “did not fully capture the context, nature, and substance” of the full report.“There is now public confusion about critical aspects of the results of our investigation. T
his threatens to undermine a central purpose for which the Department appointed the Special Counsel: to assure full public confidence in the outcome of the investigations,” he continued. To rectify the situation,
Mueller recommended that Barr release the
full 448-page report’s introduction and executive summaries
.
https://www.justsecurity.org/64441/a-side-by-side-comparison-of-barrs-vs-muellers-statements-about-special-counsel-report/A Side-by-Side Comparison of Barr’s vs. Mueller’s Statements about Special Counsel ReportComparison of Attorney General William Barr’s and Special Counsel Robert Mueller’sStatements about Special Counsel Report1. Evidence of conspiracy
Added analysis:Mueller’s statement is more explicit, in some respects, than what’s in the Report. He states that the bottom-line conclusion in Volume 1 is that there was “insufficient evidence” to bring a charge for conspiring with the Russians. That’s also very different from any suggestion that the
investigation found “no evidence,” or that allegations against the president were proven false, or that the conspiracy with Trump campaign associates did not occur. What’s more, Mueller frames the issue importantly in terms of insufficient evidence to charge “a broader conspiracy.” That’s a significant way of framing the investigation’s scope and findings.Mueller“The first volume of the report details numerous efforts emanating from Russia to influence the election. This volume includes a discussion of the Trump campaign’s response to this activity, as well as our conclusion that there was
Barr (1) “f the president is being falsely accused, which the evidence now suggests that the accusations against him were falseThis is an entire article about how Muellers PUbLIC STATEMENTS contradict what Barr has said often DIRECTLYADDRESS the FACTS or STFU you GUTLESS COWARD and TRAITOR