30 Jun 2022 11:05 am
You obviously have NO IDEA what hearsay evidence is, do you? Were the secret service people she spoke with UNDER OATH when telling her that? NO? THEN IT IS HEARSAY EVIDENCE, AND INADMISSIBLE IN ANY REAL COURT OF LAW!IkeBana » 30 Jun 2022, 8:18 am » wrote: ↑ ****, indeed. Hutchinson did not report what happened in the vehicle. She reported what she was told by those who were in the vehicle when it happened, what happened in the vehicle. Her testimony was that she was in an office with Trump Deputy Chief of Staff (and former Secret Service Agent) Tony Ornato and Bobby Engel who was the Secret Service Team leader for Donald Trump.
Her testimony was that Ornato said to her, "Did you hear what **** went down in The Beast?" "No"
And then Hutchingson testified...
After this testimony, Cheney very specifically asked Hutchinson if Engle corrected or challenged anything that Ornato was reporting to her in that meeting, or if either had come to her later to correct or change anything that Ornato reported in that meeting. Hutchinson said they had not.
And note, that along with so much other **** that Trump pulled while his oozing rectal orifice was in the big chair behind the big desk in the Oval Office, that this ride he wanted to take, to join his mob over at the Capitol was an "OTR" movement. An off-the record movement. Nobody was supposed to know that.
This is not hearsay. This is Hutchinson testifying as to a conversation she had with Ornato and Engle and what Ornato had reported in that conversation. That is not hearsay.
Read the definition and educate yourself!:
No one is saying that she perjured herself. And if your precious kangaroo court gave a **** about the FACTS, then they would WANT those secret service agents TO APPEAR AND REVEAL THAT TESTIMONY UNDER OATH!Definition of hearsay evidence: evidence based not on a witness's personal knowledge but on another's statement not made under oath