8 Jul 2022 11:47 am
Instead of wasting all your time finding links that neither you or anyone else bothers to read, why don't you simply answer a couple of key questions that your biased "interrogators" REFUSE TO ASK?B.See » 08 Jul 2022, 10:15 am » wrote: ↑ Well, guess I might as well post SOME of my content in threads that the TROLLS can TRASH and leave personal insults in.
Otherwise, of WHAT **** USE WOULD THEY BE?
In Capitol Insurrectionist news:
Republicans Still Pretty Sure All Those January 6 People Were Secret Liberals - Wonkette
There's 'Ample Probable Cause To Charge Trump,' Says Ex-Cop Wounded In Insurrection | HuffPost Latest News
Former DC cop who was assaulted by Capitol rioters said there's 'ample probable cause' for Trump to be indicted for his role in the insurrection Yelena Dzhanova
Feds say photo shows MAGA-rioting Trump appointee using riot shield against cops after he claims unfair prosecution - Raw Story
Like...
1) Why does the panel refuse to require Pelosi and Bowser to appear and answer why they refused MULTIPLE requests made by President Trump to accept the 10,000-20,000 additional security guards for the demonstration AS HE SAID WOULD BE NEEDED? Shouldn't it be of paramount importance to understand that if we are to prevent future incidents like this from happening?
2) Why has FBI informant Ray Epps not been questioned after he appears repeatedly on video inciting the crowd TO ENTER THE CAPITOL on Jan. 6th, and why hasn't the panel DEMANDED to know what other FBI and CIA agents and informants were present and incited the crowd to riot?
3) How is it that the Twitter statements President Trump made on Jan. 6th (below) have not been entered into evidence which PROVE that he did everything possible to subdue the crowd, AND WHICH WERE QUICKLY SCRUBBED AND DELETED BY TWITTER?
OK? Answer them, and stop being such a moron as you make such a feeble attempt to direct blame AWAY from Pelosi and Bowser WHO WERE COMPLETELY RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BREAK-IN!
