12 Jan 2025 3:14 pm
This idiot's case should NEVER have even been tried!*GHETTOBLASTER » 12 Jan 2025, 3:44 pm » wrote: ↑ E. Jean Carroll accused several men of sexual assault including a babysitter’s boyfriend. a dentist, a camp counselor, a college date, a boss, and Les Moonves from CBS – and, of course, Donald Trump.
She couldn’t recall the date, month, season, or year the incident happened
She never told anyone in the media about it, despite being publicly obsessed with her own sexuality
The dress she claims to have been wearing didn’t exist at the time
Her description of the dressing room at Bergdorf Goodman was inaccurate, making her sequence of events impossible
Her lawsuit was bankrolled by Jeffrey Epstein pal and Democrat (and Nikki Haley) mega-donor Reid Hoffman
Democrats created a law (The Adult Survivors Act in 2022) to enable her lawsuit to proceed
Her accusation is the exact plotline of an episode of Law & Order (one of her “favorite shows”)
Trump’s Apprentice was also one of her favorite shows
She has a history of falsely accusing men of rape, including Les Moonves
She told Anderson Cooper, “most people think of rape as being sexy. Think of the fantasies.”
She made a career promoting promiscuity, even writing glowingly of sexual assault and naming her cat Vagina
Carroll’s interviews on TV, social media posts, and inconsistent information concerning her allegations should have been enough to throw out any case, but not with Judge Kaplan.
None of her "witnesses" witnessed the alleged sexual assault".I
In ANY case law, it is up to the plaintiff to provide accurate data as to the date, time, and location of the incident. When these pertinent facts are not provided, it takes away the ability of the defendant to defend himself by simply proving he was elsewhere at the time, certainly someone as famous as Trump who has a precise log as to where he was on the day in question, and that's why this lying scumbag Carroll (and her Democrat advisors) chose not to identify that all-important date. If the judge and the DA weren't so damn corrupt to start with and demanded that information from the plaintiff, the accuser would have had her case thrown out immediately. But the fix was in and the Democrat plan from the onset was to bury Trump in legal battles that would sufficiently hurt his re-election campaign to the point where voters would turn against him. But that didn't happen because the phony charge so angered the voters that they set a record for donations on the day after that trial was held and made them more determined than ever to see Trump win the election in a landslide, much to the chagrin of the corrupt Democrat party!