User avatar
Zeets2
10 Apr 2026 12:01 pm
User avatar
      
6,832 posts
jerrab » 10 Apr 2026, 11:47 am » wrote: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

“What President Trump is describing as the destruction of ‘a whole civilization’ would be a war crime, plain and simple,” said Sarah Yager, the Washington director at Human Rights Watch and a former senior adviser on human rights to the chairman of the U.S. Joint Chiefs of Staff. “There is no gray area on this under international law.”Civilian infrastructure has been a frequent target since the U.S.–Israeli war on Iran began on February 28. “Strikes on critical infrastructure and industrial sites have disrupted basic services including electricity, water and telecommunications, also leading to increasing immediate and longer term environmental and health risks,” wrote the U.N. Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs, or OCHA, in a brief report issued last week. Airports, cultural heritage locations, hospitals, industrial sites markets, residential areas, and schools have also been struck, including the civilian international airport in Tehran, a power plant in Khorramshahr, and water reservoirs in Fars and Khuzestan. Last week, the U.S. attacked the newly constructed B1 highway bridge, which killed 8 people, who were, according to the deputy governor of Alborz province, not military targets but nearby villagers celebrating Nowruz, the Persian new year.//////////////////////////////
And what would you EXPECT any Human Rights Watch or a UN advocate to say when we destroy legitimate targets of war?
Search Assist
Yes, if a bridge is used for military logistics or troop movement, it can be considered a legitimate military target.

 
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search