peepee » 23 May 2020, 11:04 am » wrote: ↑
...in order to truly 'comm'unicate we must have a 'comm'on understanding of words/definitions/concepts...i believe 'anarchy' to be an impossibility...'an' a prefix meaning 'without'...'archy' = rule..so literally, 'anarchy' = 'without rule'... it is my understanding that with humans there are always going to be 'rules'...it's what we do...for example, i think you understand that if USFEDGOV left right now there would be all kinds of **** looking to 'rule'...maybe a 'local strongman'...maybe the hell's angels on the highways...etc. gangs galore...
...as a 'minarchist' i support 'minimum rule'... VIGOROUSLY DEBATED transparent, EGALITARIAN 'rules'...
"Anarchist" is a misnomer. They are pro-market municipalists (extreme decentralization) and oppose the banking monopoly as well as other monopolies.
They are the cousins of 'libertarians' except they will never shill for the plutocracy/corporate oligarchy.
I do not consider myself one, but I have learned a lot from them.