13 Sep 2022 7:30 pm
IT NEVER WAS WHAT YOU THOUGHT SHOULD HAVE BEEN, NOR WHAT THE WEST WANTED CONTROL OF. YOUR OPINION MEANS ****.Skans » 12 Sep 2022, 2:53 pm » wrote: ↑ We should have nuked Russia right before the invasion of Crimea. Too little too late. Obama missed our opportunity to nip this in the bud. Here's why:
- We know Russia will threaten the US with nukes for assisting the independent country of Ukraine with staying independent from Russia.
- We knew Russia wasn't just surrounding Crimea for **** and giggles.
- Therefore, we should have nuked Russia for mounting an invasion of one of our allies. First man on the red button wins the war.
NOW YOU'RE SUPPORTING BAMA, THE CIVILAN KILLER? LOL. ARE YOU SAD CHENEY DIDN'T GET RE-ELECTED TOO?
UKRAINE AN ALLY? SINCE WHEN? DID NATO BREAK THE RULES LIKE BIDEN DOES AND MAKE THEM A NATO MEMBER ?
YOU HAVEN'T A CLUE WHY PUTIN CHOSE TO HELP CRIMEA AND THE DONBAS REGIONS.
HAD IT NOT BEEN FOR THE BLOODY COUP D'ETAT, WHEN A DEMOCRATICALLY CONTROLLED GOVERNMENT WAS OVERTURNED, 2014 MAIDAN, PUTIN WOULD NEVER HAD TO MAKE A MOVE TO SAVE INNOCENT CIVILIANS FROM SLAUGHTER..
CRIMEAS LARGE ETHNIC RUSSIAN POPULATION HAVE LIVED IN THE SOVIET UNION, PRE-1954, WHEN KHRUSCHEV DIVVIED UP THE COUNTRY. AFTER 1991, UKRAINE BEGAN A BRUTAL EXTERMINATION OF BOTH PEACEFUL RUSSIANS AND UKRAINIANS WHO LIVED WITH AND SUPPORTED THEM. THE OVERWHELMING REFERENDUM WAS FOLLOWED BY THE ABSORPTION OF CRIMEA. SINCE RUSSIA TOOK BACK CRIMEA, IT HAS TURNED FROM A POVERTY-STRICKEN REGION TO ONE THAT FLOURISHES.
RUSSIA'S BEEN DEFENDING SEVASTOPOL AND ITS PEOPLE SINCE THE BATTLE OF ALMA IN 1854