17 Jun 2022 5:27 pm
As if nets can't be used to block out sea life.TB7 » 17 Jun 2022, 4:52 am » wrote: ↑Compared to wind and solar, wave and tidal power lag. The primary reason is technological hurdles and a larger investment. Also, there are fewer locations where a wave and tidal power plant can be located.
Why hasn’t tidal power taken off yet? | BBC Science Focus Magazine
The United States does not have any commercially operating tidal energy power plants, although several demonstration projects are in various stages of development. Two places in the United States with potential for tidal power are the Cook Inlet of Alaska, which has the second-highest tidal range in North America, and several places in Maine.
WAVE AND TIDAL POWER HAVE BEEN AROUND SINCE THE 60s
the USA has none, and won't for many years...because of cost and tidal turbines have the same issue that wind turbines face with birds and marine life collisions. As turbines spin, fish and other sea life could swim into the blades leading to serious injury or death. Tidal turbines also create low-level noise beneath the surface of the water that negatively impacts marine mammals, like seals. They also pose a threat to marine plants due to a change in silt deposits and the changing of the structure of the estuary.
Disadvantages of Tidal Energy: A Detailed Guide | Linquip
GET BACK TO US IN 15 YEARS ON THE PROGRESS OF THIS RENEWABLE ENERGY SOURCE
MY BAD...WE WON'T BE AROUNDAlexandria Ocasio-Cortez Predicts the World Will End in 12 Years
TRUMPER SCUM ONLY WANT US HUMANS TO BREATHE TOXIC FUMES. NO WAY OUT! WE ARE ALL DOOMED WHEN WE FINALLY RUN OUT, & IT WILL ALL SOMEHOW BE "JOE BIDEN'S FAULT!"