Cannonpointer » 28 Apr 2022, 4:03 pm » wrote: ↑
And there goes your ****, self-betrayed.
In PREVIOUS posts - apparently, just to pretend at being "reasonable," you lied that the fault in my position was that I was ASSUMING the child was being victimized, when in fact, the child might or might not be.
So I pointed out your hypocrisy, as you object to the "conversation" that it was YOUR position ought to happen for my concerns to be validated. Once I point out the Texas law is a method of VALIDATING my concerns, your true agenda emerges. You want absolute protection from scrutiny by state mental health professionals - even AFTER you have admitted that such (suddenly abundant) cases
could be in service to a parent's mental disorder.
DKDC - not relevant. A couple of months in a bureacratic system is less than five minutes in dog years. Nice attempt at deflection - asking me to do a google chase.
SOMEONE? What do you think got this ball rolling? You don't think some worried grandparents who were told three year old BillyJohn is now Billie Jean might have made a few calls?
And when did you start believing that the sexual representations of toddlers should be treated as legally meritorious?
Every state takes anonymous complaints. Child welfare is high on the list - at least in red states, still.
Oh, I think we have all seen whose mind is already made up. You are against the state even looking into these cases - notwithstanding they have every earmark of Munchausen Mommy.