*Beekeeper » 12 Dec 2024, 5:39 am » wrote: ↑
No, that's not the case here. When this injection is only applicable to a very small percentage of the population, the development costs MUST be spread over a much smaller number of sold items.
If you require $2 billion to research and develop a new line of cars, then only build 5,000 of them, that $2 billion is spread over a MUCH smaller number of cars than if you build 1,500,000 of them. WHY you idiots can't seem to fathom how that same principle applies to drugs is totally a statement of how **** INDOCTRINATED you losers in life really have become.
How "**** INDOCTRINATED" you are and don't even know it!!! The taxpayers fund most research and development of new drugs, then big pharmas get to rip the taxpayers off for big profits. Big pharmaceutical corporations have become richer than big oil since the corona virus scam.
"It turns out that U.S. taxpayers are the ones that are not only funding that upstream basic science research that make all drug discovery possible, but are actually funding the invention of a substantial portion of new drugs," lead author
Rahul Nayak, MD, told STAT."
Many New Drugs Benefit from Taxpayer-Funded Research | ASH Clinical News | American Society of Hematology