Vegas » 03 Jun 2021, 6:02 pm » wrote: ↑
LOL! You claim a lot about yourself, and have yet to prove any of it. How's the truck driving coming along?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/718b9/718b9cc3dc77b7d8e00b997bece86ac1c72c8d43" alt="ROFL :rofl:"
Politifact is a biased, left-wing, pro-dim-0-crap Soros funded propaganda organization.
Why are we being lied to about Covid? There’s no good reason
Posted on
May 12, 2021
Be in no doubt, among the reasons that voices and opinions like mine are never heard in the main media is extreme censorship more suited to China than a liberal democracy. Please allow me to illustrate with an example close to my heart why it is high time for us to change our response.Ivermectin is one of the WHO’s ‘essential drugs’ which all countries should have access to. It’s very cheap as its patent has long expired; it’s one of the most-used drugs in world history; it’s extraordinarily safe; it is often life-saving against parasitic infections. It is also one of the best-established pharmaceutical treatments for Covid-19, showing benefit in every stage of the disease, in multiple independent clinical trials of varying quality. On January 3, 2021, Dr Tess Lawrie attempted to alert the Prime Minister to the potential of ivermectin. Her video here was pulled from YouTube within hours of posting, though it survives on
Vimeo. The paper by the FLCCC group of US intensivists (whose survival rates for severe Covid-19 are best in class) that was the inspiration for Dr Lawrie’s work was accepted after extensive open peer review (including two career employees of the FDA) and ‘provisionally accepted’ by the ‘open science’ journal
Frontiers in Pharmacology. The screenshot of the abstract tweeted by Clare Craig shown
here attracted more than 100,000 views. Then, mysteriously, it was rejected and pulled by the
Frontiers editor in chief. It is still
here in cached form though the Ministry of Truth has been at work and placed it in a memory hole, so no trace survives on
Frontiers’ own website.
Intended for a Special Issue on ‘repurposed drugs’ for Covid-19, various guest editors were so incensed at this behaviour that they resigned in protest. You can read their letter
here. They concluded that ‘these unfortunate events constitute gross editorial misconduct by
Frontiers.’ Fortunately this major paper is now published by the
American Journal of Therapeutics and can be read in its final form
here.
This nevertheless successfully delayed by nearly six months its circulation to leading public health bodies starting mid-November. A copy was sent to Sir Jeremy Farrar (boss of the Wellcome Trust and member of Sage) who passed it on to Professor Peter Horby (also on Sage), amongst others, on November 18, 2020. So the efficacy of ivermectin must be well known to the Government’s advisers, but they have done nothing about it.
Likewise, the formal and rigorous meta-analysis performed by Dr Tess Lawrie’s team at the Evidence-Based Medicine Consultancy Ltd has been communicated to Matt Hancock, but without reply.
I am telling you about this, because all that governments, their scientific advisers, big pharma (
here’s Merck, who originally developed & marketed it) and regulatory agencies will tell you is that ivermectin doesn’t work in Covid-19. They are lying. I am inviting any of them to sue me, but they won’t, for I would win easily.
If ivermectin was more widely used, there’d be no need for vaccines.
To date, despite the brains, expertise and stature of those scientists questioning the official Covid-19 narrative, as a group they quite patently have been ineffective. And this is unlikely to change while, as polite professionals, they won’t say: ‘This is corruption and they’re lying deliberately to scare the people.’ Furthermore, unwittingly, they have been playing the parts intended by those, including our own Government and their advisers, who control the global Covid narrative.
They judged correctly that we polite Brits wouldn’t accuse them of outright lying, even though they often do exactly that. Boris Johnson’s recent piece to camera, telling us that it was lockdown and not vaccination which reduced cases and deaths, is a case in point.
Yet it’s certain this isn’t true, and also certain he and his advisers know it isn’t true.
The government’s advisers are not fools. Some may be, but the upper echelons are very smart. They believe polite people won’t say ‘not only are you lying but you’re doing it in concert with other, non-democratic actors’, because that’s conspiracy theory stuff, right? Powerful people never use their influence to benefit their interests, do they? Hmm. The only thing that’s different is scale and the power their public positions give them. Other than that, they’re just another a bunch of grubby criminals, ripping off unsuspecting people.
Truth is our most powerful tool. And that truth is that we’re being lied to.
The truth also, however hard it is to believe it, is that there is unequivocal and clear evidence of planning and co-ordination. Not to face this fact is to have your head in the sand. Where it’s leading is easy to discern, once people are willing to lift their internal censoring and look objectively at the evidence.
First, though, the lies. It’s abundantly clear now that pretty much everything that the public has been told and continues to be told is between untrue and downright lies.
I offer as a shortlist that:
-PCR mass testing reasonably reliably distinguishes infected and infectious people from others;-that masks reduce transmission of respiratory viruses;-that transmission of infection in the absence of symptoms is an important contribution to epidemic spreading;-that lockdowns as executed reduce hospitalisation and deaths;-that no matter how small the remaining susceptible population and no matter that virtually no people who, if infected, might die remain unvaccinated, the position is perilous;-that no pharmaceutical treatments are available;-that variants are different enough to warrant border closures and require new vaccines;-that the gene-based vaccines are safe and effective;-that ‘vaccine passports’ will increase safety while having no material impacts on freedom of choice in a liberal democracy.It is impossible to believe that intelligent, well-connected and well-briefed senior advisers to governments don’t know that almost all, if not all, of the above are simply not true.
[…]
Via
https://alethonews.com/2021/05/11/why-are-we-being-lied-to-about-covid-theres-no-good-reason/
https://stuartbramhall.wordpress.com/2021/05/12/why-are-we-being-lied-to-about-covid-theres-no-good-reason/
BIG PHARMA CANNOT MAKE $BILLIONS FROM A N OLD DRUG THAT IS NO LONGER ABLE PATENTED. THAT IS WHY YOU ARE BEING LIED TO ABOUT ITS EFFICACY AGAINST THE KUNG FLU, ****. But I could care less what your being **** about...you are **** about many things!!!