4 Jun 2021 11:50 am
The FDA is in the pocket of big pharma and they are going to do what big pharma wants. Big pharma does not want Ivermectin approved because it is a cheap, safe, effective cure for kung flu and they cannot profit $BILLIONS from its use.Vegasgiants » 04 Jun 2021, 11:11 am » wrote: ↑ Fact
Ivermectin has not been proven safe for the treatment of covid according to the fda
Deny that
Just like cancer, the money is in the expensive, experimental treatments and not the cure.
Has Ivermectin been proven unsafe and ineffective? DENT THAT, asshole!!!
WHEN INDIA STOPPED PRESCRIBING IVERMECTIN AND STARTED VACCINATING THE DEATHS SHOT UP
Back in January, all talk was about Ivermectin, a cheap and effective remedy being used in India.However, the attention went onto the vaccine and since then the deaths have gone up and up and there are indications this might be repeated elsewhere. Doctor Believes Ivermectin Drug Can Help India Stop Covid-19 Second Wave
- Dr Surya Kant Tripathi, Head, Respiratory Medicine Department at King George Medical University in Lucknow believes this drug could help take control over the novel coronavirus
- Ivermectin is an anti-parasitic drug that has been beneficial in treating various kinds of tropical diseases, including onchocerciasis, helminthiases, and scabies
- The creators of the drug, Omura and Campbell were even awarded the Nobel Prize for physiology and medicine in 2015
- Addressing the lack of available clinical data on Ivermectin, Kant states that around 8 trials out of the total 66 trials are currently underway in India, with none showing any major side effects
Covid Candy,4 April, 2021 About six weeks ago, the WHO promised to issue updated guidance about ivermectin, an anti-parasitic drug that many believe is a panacea for COVID-19. “This drug has broad spectrum activity,” they admitted, “and this is why it can be used at the early stage of the disease, trying to prevent the severe disease,” but of course, they said, as they have said from the start, more studies are needed to determine if it actually works. “We need more clinical trials.” That was their guidance six months ago, that was their guidance six weeks ago, and that is the same **** they regurgitated when they finally issued their updated guidance Wednesday, on the heels of some Philippines-specific guidance WHO had issued the very day before, serving to muddy those murky waters.For weeks, health care professionals, ivermectin advocates and early treatment activists had lobbied the organization to #BeBraveWHO, but some of those people are now realizing that it was not cowardice driving these acts, but rampant, unchecked corruption. Others take the more generous view that the WHO was only negligent issuing counter-productive guidance from the belated start of the pandemic, when they advised against travel restrictions, asserted that there was no evidence for human-to-human transmission, insisted there was no evidence for asymptomatic transmission and that it was rare before walking that back, played dumb about the implications of what “aerosolized” means, adamantly denied that the virus is airborne, finally admitted the virus might be aerosolized and airborne, but couched it in mealy-mouthed, weaselly wording, saying they’re “open to ’emerging’ evidence on modes of transmission,” said that masks “create a false sense of security” and advised against their use for the general population before recommending in favor of mass-masking, and demanded that people refrain from even wondering about the origin of the virus aloud, saying that the potential “stigma” was actually “more dangerous than the virus itself“.
Full article:
https://seemorerocks.is/when-india-stop ... s-shot-up/
How long are they going to say that more testing is reguired when over a goddamn year has gone by and they are still injecting subject with the experimental gene concoctions?