24 Jan 2023 7:36 am
You're so stupid you don't realize you're making our argument. "...without fear of government censorship" right there in your post. The First Amendment is not about censorship in a private business, it's about censorship by the government. Social media platform owners are not violating the First Amendment because they are not the government. The owners actually have the Constitutional right to take control over language and speech that appears in their business. Just like the owners and management of a business has the right to fire any employee, any time they desire, for speech they do not want in their workplace.Mr.7 » 23 Jan 2023, 10:13 am » wrote: ↑ You truly are an IGNORANT POS.
In general, the First Amendment guarantees the right to express ideas and information. On a basic level, it means that people can express an opinion (even an unpopular or unsavory one) without fear of government censorship. It protects all forms of communication, from speeches to art and other media.
CENSORSHIP OF SPEECH BY OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT IN THE WORKPLACE OR ON SOCIAL MEDIA PLATFORMS IS NOT GOVERNMENT CENSORSHIP, IT IS PRIVATE BUSINESS CENSORSHIP AND NOT A VIOLATION OF ANYTHING IN THE CONSITUTION.
The IGNORANT POS is you.
And your "in general" as it applies to the First Amendment? **** really? How's about we apply some generalities that we approve of to the Second Amendment, eh? And we watch your head burst into flames.
