freeman » 21 May 2022, 8:46 am » wrote: ↑
You of course start with one of the
big lies of
Big Pharma's owned little bi*ches. Pragmatists that exercised a wait and see approach rather than volunteer to be phase 3 lab rats for a criminal corporation's investigational, experimental,
genetically engineered,
chemically enhanced,
innate immune response reprogramming,
leaky,
escape mutant training,
gene therapy, are well aware that there is a reason that even "perfect" vaccines generally go through 10 years of testing and trials before becoming widely accepted.
So besides a distrust of a government/legacy media/Big Tech/medical journals/ that are all "owned" by Big Pharma, the
risk VS benefit equation for volunteering to be a lab rat for a product that generally requires 10 years of development - even when it's not a technology that has never before been tried on humans - was ridiculous.
A person average age under 70 had a
3 in 10,000 chance of dying of COVID - including fat diabetics with cancer. And that number is
without accounting for 99.99% effective early treatment, with decades-proven-safe generic drug/nutraceutical protocols.
MyFreeDoctor.com has treated 150,000 COVID patients with a 99.99% success rate
So it's a flat out lie to refer to pragmatists that calculated their risk VS benefit ratio for the experimental jabs with never before tried on humans technology, as being "anti-vaxxers". Only a falsely-accusing pig would parrot a lie like that. While pragmatists such as myself, I've no doubt, are indeed becoming increasingly anti-
COVID-"vaxx" based on the increasing body of evidence against Big Pharma's criminal corporation's, liability-free, hundred-billion-dollars-in-profits, investigational experiment on humanity.
Vaccine RISK VS BENEFIT - Pragmatism (absurdly, "hesitant") VS blind obedience
Now I'll expose the ignorance expressed in rest of your post, in the post that follows.