Yesterday 5:40 am
As always, I view the consequences of Trump’s victory over Kameltoe to be preferable and balance the burden of now against what might have been.Cannonpointer » Yesterday, 11:14 pm » wrote: ↑ I think the event happened. I think the attendance was disappointing to the event's producers. I think the diappointing attendance is relevant to Trump's weakening grip on evangelicals.
I think that anyone who is surprised that a fellow who promised to expose the child predators and then used his office to shield them is having issues with evangelicals - well, anyone surprised by that fact is operating on low wattage and voltage.
I mean, duh. You promise to expose epstein's clients, and you say you have the names and dirty deeds on your desk, and then you turn around and say it doesn't exist? You're gonna lose credibility with right thinking people. You are welcome to FORGIVE Trump. To assume he has good reasons - that he's not covering his own ***, as the left believes. That is a valid assumption to make. But to assume that everyone ELSE is going to feel the same way is asinine. Plenty of people draw the line at covering for child rapists. They don't GAF about the sensitive nature of exposing powerful people, the international implications and ramifications. They just want you to go after kid **** and damn the costs of it.
For you, helping kid rapers get away with it might be acceptable, if there are big stakes. Hell, I can engage in such thinking, myself. Go after the elites at what cost? But for many - especially for evangelicals - not so much. They don't GAF about the moral relativism - the weighing of the costs of going after these elite child ****. They're done with Trump the minute he let kid-**** off the hook.