maineman » 15 Feb 2023, 7:20 am » wrote: ↑
nice dodge.
You are the guy who claimed that, because the voting rules had been "illegally" altered, that the votes cast under the guise of those rules were "illegal" as well. I pointed out that every court in the land disagreed with that premise. Votes cast in good faith by well intentioned voters obeying the rules cannot be "illegal" just because the rules were later adjudged to have been improperly crafted.
And again.... semantics is nothing I care to engage in with you. YOU have claimed that voting rule changes made to protect public health were somehow fraudulent tricks made by democrats to illegally enable Joe Biden to steal the election and no court has agreed with THAT claim in any way. NOTHING about any rule change that was made was done for the explicit purpose of aiding one party over the other.... there were ALL made in the non-partisan interests of public health.
And finally, I must tell you that you have never lost your ability to bring a chuckle to my heart with your incessant use of the imperial "we" creating this silly illusion of you, standing as the intellectual spokesperson of some august gathering of learned conservative thinkers. It's cute. Don't lose that affect.

Hey Wilford.....I thought you were dead.