Liberal Forum

LowIQTrash » 15 Jul 2023, 6:12 pm » wrote: ↑

15 Jul 2023, 6:12 pm

"You can't get a retarded person to understand something because s/he/it is too retarded." ~ Sinclair 

I have been pondering what "modernity" really means for a while. Normally this is where people with Masters and PhDs in the liberal arts and social sciences would chime in, but, seeing as there is no legitimate room for actual debate in higher education due to the prevalence of ideology, I decided posting this here would be resonant (despite the higher levels of retardation).

(By the way, unlike you conservative retards, I DO believe there is a great deal of value in the liberal arts and social sciences. As a matter of fact, it was the left's takeover of these departments that allowed their ideologies to proliferate in the first place. Get that through your thick skull.)

That being said, I am not so retarded as to spend $20K+ a yr for 2-4 yrs to procure a piece of paper with the words "Master of [X]" or "Doctorate of [X]."

1. No Lives Matter

When a soldier dies today, whether it's some poor chap from Kansas sent off to Iraq to "defend freedom" or some гопник from the Urals participating in Putin's "special military operation," there is almost always some sort of fanfare or service to commemorate the person's death.

However, these rituals are largely meaningless because human lives are...well, to put it bluntly, not worth anything these days. Uunless you are the modern equivalent of Tesla, Watson, or Planck, you are a disposable peon.

Back in 80000 B.C., it was not uncommon for a tribe or village to lose 50-80% of its members were they to be raided or assaulted in the middle of the night by another tribe or village. Many of these miniature societies were simply wiped from existence if the remaining members were incapable of sustaining themselves. In other words, every death mattered, and mattered greatly. The value of a human life was very high - and easy to lose. 

As the liberal Steven Pinker noted, societies have become less violent over time. It appears @FOS  agrees with him as he noted that, in contrast to earlier times (the ancient "predecessors" of fascism, if you will), even the fascism of today is quite moderate. Fascism called for a lower level of violence than the philosophies embraced by ancient emperors and kings (whatever you wish to call them), even though practically everyone today - whether socialists, communists, retarded conservatives, retarded liberals, retarded libertarians, etc. - think fascism is "extreme." 

Yes, fascism is "extreme" when you compare it to Wall Street whores (Democrats + Republicans) whose goal is to service the international finance oligarchy. It's not so extreme when you examine history.

Thanks to the "Green revolution" there are also now more people than ever before. The value of something tends to be inversely related to its quantity - more people = less value per person, yet we are expected to believe that "human lives are valuable." 

Or my favorite slogan - "All lives matter." 

The truth is the opposite. A human life today is almost worthless. YOU are worthless.