5 Mar 2024 3:08 pm
But you are giving aj undeserved credit. He cannot even set up the board. I think we should be loyal to the truth no matter how tragic it is.Skans » 05 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm » wrote: ↑ You're right, but its implied. AJ in his OP challenged "anyone" to a debate. In response, GB stated a concise and debatable premise. AJ took the GB's bait and (inartfully) attacked the GB with an ad hominim attack. But, more than that, AJ failed to make any other point whatsoever to discredit GB's premise. Therefore, GB did win the debate. He was right to declare himself the winner.
I agree, AJ is too stupid to debate. But, GB is not. GB accepted the challenge and stated a topic/premise for debate. AJ was set up, and got checkmated on his very first move (which is impossible in chess). I have to call it the way I see it.