27 Jun 2024 12:07 pm
Well...not exactly. The natsocs had to adjust their policies to account for more modern technology such as the industrial revolution...which radically altered the life of workers and also the possibilities of state power. There is no way you can just replicate the economic system of some pre industrial society in an era of current technology.LowIQTrash » 27 Jun 2024, 1:10 am » wrote: ↑ I learned from an old timer on Unz.com that the economic policy of the NSDAP was remarkably similar to that which existed in American colonial times prior to the Bank of England outlawing colonial scrip. The idea was simply to create colonial scrip and use it to harness the power of labor productivity. E.G. The money would be used to pay for the construction of textile mills or canals and disallowed from use in real estate speculation (of course it still happened but there are ways to minimize this possible outcome with stringent punishments).
Once the scrip was taken away the colonials were forced to make remittances in gold, which (of course) was drained from the coffers and the unemployment rate spiked into the 30% range.
It was all a [[[coincidence]]].
When conjobs hear the words "social welfare" their immediate Pavlov dog pathos tells them it's about "giving people EBT and Section 8" which "breeds laziness."
The real problem is that the vast majority of people are too retarded to understand "the nature of money" (as former user pisspiss liked to say) so you could just give them the simple solution and they would still ignore what you have to say / pretend what's going on in the status quo is anything "normal."
What we have today is not normal at all - it's an abomination.
but one thing in the magna Carta which was loosely followed by the British empire and was removed after the revolution is that children cannot inherent debts from their parents to jews. Jews were explicitly mentioned in the magna Carta because they were the official moneylenders...but in principle I suppose it could apply to anyone.
I have heard people say that natsocs based their currency on labor rather than gold. I think that is not exactly correct, but it is close. The natsocs realized that what really backs currency is power...Noth military power and production. If some sovereign demands that some piece of paper has value, then people will respect that if he is the sovereign of a powerful and productive country. They won't if he isnt...even if the currency is backed in something like gold. Because any genuinely powerful nation can simply decide to control gold mines. It is just an irrelevant and illusory middle step.