4 Jul 2024 2:13 pm
But you are contradicting yourself. As you pointed out, the nsdap did not start out being in power. Therefore, they were able to 'destroy' political opposition in any way other than persuading the people that they were correct and had the best plan for helping Germany. That was a necessary part of them acquiring power.Beekeeper » 04 Jul 2024, 1:25 pm » wrote: ↑ The NAZIS didn't come into any real power UNTIL 1933. They had been a mere fringe group from 1920 and their quest for POWER is nearly identical in today's DEMOCRAT PIECE OF NAZI **** PARTY!!
LUST for power is what the NAZIS had in Germany and the IDENTICAL LUST FOR POWER EXISTS IN THE DEMOCRATS OF TODAY!! In both cases, they use(d) any method possible to destroy their political opposition.
Learn some REAL HISTORY for a change you braindead NAZI PUKE!!
But still, you are not addressing the point I made and the absurdity of it. i will remind you. The nadap had no issue with determining who its party leader was. It was adolf hitler. So why woukd you compare the democrats to the nsdap when they struggle to find their own leadership? Whether you like the nsdap or whatever is irrelevant to think logical issue. You are just being totally incoherent.
it would be like if I decided to compare the republican party to the roman empire because they are both buddhist. It is false in both cases and it is irrelevant. Why did you even want to make the comparison in the first place?