4 Aug 2024 2:02 pm
LowIQTrash » 04 Aug 2024, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ Let me clarify the term usage. Maybe @FOS can add his own.
When FOS uses the term “Jews” he not only refers to a hidden cabal of (beyond your imagination) wealthy and powerful Jews, but their genetic predisposition.
Genetics largely determines a population’s fate, and Jews have been known to exhibit very high levels of sociopathy / out-group predatory behavior. Probably natural selection had to do with this (at one point in history, I believe, Ashkenazi numbers were reduced below 10,000. They were very much in danger of extinction.)
Ask yourself why whites tend to have higher levels of social trust, while Indians and Chinese are always trying to find (slimy) tactics to “get ahead” of everyone else. It’s due to their MILLENNIA of “genetic, ancestral memories” that recall the horrors of famine, displacement, and destitution.
Even today, labor unions are far more common in WHITE countries. Go to an Asian country and…you will find very few labor orgs. They are ALL trying to grab a piece of the pie from someone else.
We all know that your Jewish neighbor who lives a few blocks down is not the source of the country’s woes. But that’s beside the point. Saying “Jews” gives it a biological legitimacy, as in “This is definitely JOO behavior.”
The fact there are non-Jewish Anglo-Zionists (which you correctly assess) doesn’t change the interpretation of this situation.
in the current day, any anglo who has wealth and potentially power just sees himself as an individual who happens to have wealth and power. He has no sense of responsibility for his fellow anglos.
The jew with wealth and power, however, is the opposite. He considers himself an agent of jewish interests.
It is easy to understand from simple game theory that if a tribe of united people pushing collective interests compete against a bunch of disorganized 'individuals', it is going to always be the tribe that wins. It wouldn't even matter if the anglos were 99% of the population...the organized 1% would still always win...because there would be no resistance to their agenda.
So speaking of any anglo responsibility for anything just makes no sense.. not since ww2 when the anglos decided to abandon their nationalism. For sure, once upon a time there was a British empire. But today it is both spiritually and literally dead. And the fatal mistake they made was offering power to jews, who used that power to get the anglos involved in 2 world wars.