11 Apr 2022 8:13 am
you just dont get it dude.peepee » 11 Apr 2022, 6:46 am » wrote: ↑
...no such thing as 'anarchy' [literally 'without government or rule(s)'] ...absent what you see now as 'traditional government' we will have many many individuals and many many groups making lots and lots of rules, dumb@ss...
...i consider myself a minarchist [minimum government] ...you are merely a rank and foul authoritardian who favors arbitrary government by some f@cking fool 'fascists', dumb@ss... get real...
you cannot have a 'political theory' that you want 'little politics'. That is just incoherent.
Power will still exist. You will not be eliminating power. You are just choosing to impose no ability to discriminate who has power or what their agenda is. Just disarming yourself.
that isnt politics that is anti politics.
and you arrived at this absurd and self contradictory position through arbitrary ethical concepts, rather than an attempt to face and solve actual problems. You are operating with faith that as long as you do the 'right' thing, which is nothing, God will take care of you.
but any realistic analysis of what you advocate should show that you inevitably will simply become enslaved by some entity that you do not officially call 'the state'.
consider your idiotic obsession with the federal reserve, for example. That is power given to private individuals that you are not voting for. they are not technically part of the 'state'. How would your silly 'minimal government' model do anything about that? it couldnt.