User avatar
Jantje_Smit
28 Feb 2025 3:29 am
User avatar
      
5,988 posts
Cannonpointer » 27 Feb 2025, 7:30 pm » wrote: Looks like Russia has all the best **** - but there's still plenty left for Trump to get into the U.S. pile. 

What a **** show. The U.S. really **** Ukraine right in the *** - and everyone is blaming Russia, which is hilarious. 

Russia had the decency not to force the U.S. to face-**** Fidel. The Green t-shirt didn't get so lucky. We continued to lash his back and send his hapless citizens into cauldron after cauldron of Ruskie inferno. It was a **** thing to do - and now Trump is making those **** pay us for having done it. 

Man, life is tough. Tougher when you're stupid.
Something smells about that deal, I saw this, it seems Zelensky already signed Ukraine's resources to the UK, that would explain certain things..

Image  

What's the deal with Ukraine's rare earths?

...To preempt Trump, Keir Starmer rushed to cut the deal with Zelensky who signed over Ukraine's resources in the framework of the "One Hundred Year Partnership..." The new partnership was signed on 16 January of this year, only four days before Donald Trump's inauguration. Allegedly, it includes a secret Appendix, which provides that after the end of hostilities, the UK would gain control of all of Ukraine's ports, power plants, natural gas concessions, storage facilities and pipelines, titanium deposits and more.

 Apparently, Zelensky signed over these resources in exchange for the UK's commitment to Ukraine's security, support for NATO membership and "no less than £3 billion a year," for "as long as needed to support Ukraine." The intelligence leaks cited by AENews may or may not be true, but reading through the "One Hundred Year Partnership" certainly makes them seem plausible. To begin with, it is very unlikely that the UK has committed to providing such generous support to Ukraine out of pure charity. Also, the 100-year partnership is not the "whole agreement."

 Customarily, agreements contain the "whole agreement" clause which stipulates that contracting parties' commitments are limited to that which is explicitly spelled out in the agreement. Instead, the partnership's Article 11 refers to unspecified "further agreements or arrangements as necessary and appropriate to implement this agreement."

 A secret appendix would also explain Keir Starmer's urgent request to meet with Donald Trump. It may also explain why Trump's statement that Zelensky was a dictator caused such a hysterical reaction in the UK. If Zelensky was not the legitimate representative of Ukraine at the time when he signed the agreement with Starmer (he was not), then the whole 100-year UK-Ukraine honeymoon could be null and void.

request to meet with Donald Trump
 
 
 
In memory of Pumpkins

Image
Updated 2 minutes ago
© 2012-2025 Liberal Forum