13 Feb 2023 6:55 am
Some of the headlines are claiming that 85% of men on Ivermectin were rendered infertile after the treatment, but there are several reasons to be very skeptical about this claim. Firstly, the research looked at 385 patients with onchocerciasis, but ultimately decided to only enroll 37 of them in the study, excluding a whopping 90% of potential participants due to initial low sperm counts. This alone is a huge red flag which wasn’t really addressed in the paper. Why was there such a high number of men with already low sperm counts in their study population? Well, that might well be due to the parasite itself.Buffalo » 12 Feb 2023, 12:56 pm » wrote: ↑ IVERMECTIN WORKS!!!
The corrupt government in cahoots with corrupt big pharm are guilty of the deaths of MILLIONS of people all for big profits by pushing their gene therapy ineffective vaccines while suppressing the life saving anti-viral cheap drug, Ivermectin. Why did they intentionally suppress, even threaten hospitals and doctors with sanctions and even license suspensions, iif they gave their covid patients Ivernmectin? BECAUSE THERE WAS NO PROFITS FROM ITS USE!!!
Back in September my doctor, trying to get me to take the clot shot (vaccine), told me Ivermectin did not prevent or cure covid. I told him it did because I took it and he knows I am over weight with COPD from smoking for 42 years. He said he had 8 patients die from covid that had taken Ivermectin. I asked him how many patents of his had died from covid that had been vaxxed and boosted. He didn't answer but walked out of the exam room...Hmmm...
Watch this 14 minute video and see the proof for yourself.
https://odysee.com/@Zelot:e/IVERMECTIN-DOCUMENTARY:a
Question, where is the research on people who do not have river blindness (onchocerciasis)?
Stevia was added to the USA food supply as an alternative to sugar but people don't know that the natives use stevia for birth control.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2fhDsDwEhZk