12 Aug 2023 6:11 am
Being signed over to various an anti all creation eugenics corporation communes that the taxpayer citizen must subsidize after six hundred thousand American citizens die is not freedom. Lincoln and others should have argued in the courts that the slaves could learn to read contracts and could not be considered as animals or partial animals in the law instead of attacking the civilian population. As it is 2023 humans (carbon units) of all skin colors can enjoy less legal protection than an animal.Vegas » 11 Aug 2023, 12:21 pm » wrote: ↑ The quote below was from Lincoln. However, to avoid any accusations of cherry picking, let's put it in context. Lincoln only wanted to abolish slavery to preserve the union. It was in the way. He never advocated for their equality. He abolished slavery, he never allowed for their rights like white people. It was only a necessity.
Why is he always considered a hero when he only wanted slavery abolished for political reasons, not for moral ones?
"Lincoln's Evolving Racial Views" - Rutherford B. Hayes Presidential Library & Museums (rbhayes.org)
Bipartisan spending Bill Contains $575 Million for ‘Reproductive Health’ in targeted areas where Population Growth ‘Threatens Biodiversity’ (animals)
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"We have a population that is not reproducing on its own with the same level that it used to," Schumer said during the press conference. "The only way we're going to have a great future is if we welcome and embrace immigrants, the dreamers and all of them.
Can't have feudalism without people being separated into different classes and groups, cant have American individual citizens who can negotiate their own individual contracts.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1jpx5lhPEY