26 Oct 2023 8:28 am
If I remember correctly CO2 was about warming problems however it is the winter temperatures (happens every year when the sun moves to the south) that is going to kill large numbers of people who do not have heating fuel, not the summer temperatures. Strange how non voluntarily classed and grouped neo feudal peasants subsidize the favored corporation groups while also paying the highest inflation monopoly prices then take the blame for a said-claimed warming problem that would help them to survive.Majik » 26 Oct 2023, 7:44 am » wrote: ↑ The Climate Cult is more than willing to change whatever it must to keep its confidence scam alive. That’s what they mean when they say climate change. They don’t mean temperature; they mean the Climate data and the Climate narrative. They’ll change anything but the solution and do whatever is required to keep the wealth redistribution/tyranny accelerator laundromat open.When research peeks over the consensus wall to challenge approved dogma, the Pharisees are quick to discredit it—shills for oil, anti-science, climate deniers. Destroying careers is well within the realm of acceptable behavior as is blocking credential research or pressing experts to alter results. But what if the research comes from an official government agency?If you control the agency, then its job has been to reinforce the confidence scam. They issue grants that produce the results needed and then base official policy on their rigged research. But not everyone appears to be in on the scam. Norway, not exactly a conservative bastion of political or cultural practice, uses the National Statistical Institute of Norway to generate official statistics. Things upon which the country relies to inform politicians and people. It published a paper titled “To what extent are temperature levels changing due to greenhouse gas emissions?”I’m sure they went in thinking, well, we’ve got data and records, and everyone’s been on about CO2 and temperature change. Let’s crunch this stuff and then impress everyone with the evidence. The conclusion at which they arrived contradicts the Climate Cult’s approved narrative. Those temperature models used to justify CO2 reduction policy don’t actually justify it
Remember, this is the government of Norway.
- All four previous interglacial periods are seen to be warmer than the present.”
- warmer temperatures were the norm in the earlier part of the past 4,000 years, including century-long intervals nearly 1°C warmer than the decade (2001-2010).”
- The results imply that the effect of man-made CO2 emissions does not appear to be sufficiently strong to cause systematic changes in the pattern of the temperature fluctuations.