RedheadedStranger » 07 Sep 2023, 1:31 pm » wrote: ↑
Yes.
If it were a choice between coercing a witness to lie under oath to get a conviction or allowing a guilty man to walk, then the guilty man should walk.
I think it's interesting that you feel the opposite.
Suborning perjury is a felony. If an "officer of the court" (attorney or judge) has evidence it has happened they are legally bound to step forward.
Just curious...with all the real issues in this world to discuss, why make up a stupid *** hypothetical question?