solon » 21 Apr 2021, 1:39 pm » wrote: ↑
Your first sentence is silly. WE write laws that say MURDER is against the law. How does that STOP MURDER? Does that mean we shouldnt HAVE laws against murder I men they dont STOP it
Then we get silly talking points I was hoping for REAL discussion but no we get the AGE OLD SILLYNESS. The gun might not do it by itself but it makes it aLOT EASIER and the countries that DO regulate guns have a LOT LESS MURDERS. That is a FACT
Then its back to the silly logical fallacy. Since criminals dont listen to lwas why do we write ANY of them? Nothing STOPS people from comitting murder or robging banks are you arguing that we shouldnt HAVE LAWS agasinst murder and robbing banks?
Thank you for making my point. We ALREADY have laws on the books making it illegal to shoot people and/or kill them...yet people still commit murder. Why do we need another law that won't stop people from breaking the laws that already exist?
Why do you want to "punish" people who obey the law? Focus on enforcing the laws that exist and punishing people who break them.
Oh...and FYI...other countries don't have to follow our Constitution. If you like their laws better, you could always move there.