solon » 21 Apr 2021, 1:51 pm » wrote: ↑
You had no point. IT is not punishing someone to say you dont need THESE guns in public or ALL gun sales must be regulated with backround checks. How about trigger locks o... Again we are not talking about taking your guns way maybe some SPECIFIC types of guns that are not necessary for any reasonable reason but the bottom line is GUN CONTROL MEASURES to lessen the CARNAGE is legal and not an attack on your right to have a gun
No you didnt HAVE a point you were claiming that since people wont listen to the law why HAVE a law. That is alogical fallacy abd I showed why. We DO have a right to put some restrictions on guns that can bring down teh cost we pay in BLOOD with these constant killings then we should. The gun nuts will always demand that NOTHING be done. We can do some things wtihout taking away the right to have a gun and if its over your objectgsions too bad.
Saying we already HAVE laws so we dont need laws is dumb.
I noticed you didn't answer the question. How, specifically, will this proposal reduce the "carnage" (to use your word)?
FYI...I never said we don't need laws. There you go lying again. Like a typical liberal. When you are scared to answer a question, resort to lies and/or personal attacks.