7 Sep 2024 6:23 pm
According to your post...you lied about what the father said. The father said he did not have "unsupervised access to them". That is NOT the same a no access. It was not a crime for the father to purchase the gun...it is not a crime to gift that gun to his son...it is not a crime for the son to possess the gun.jerrab » 06 Sep 2024, 1:19 pm » wrote: ↑ the father said his son had no access to guns but then went ahead and bought him an assault rifle
---------------------
https://www.cbsnews.com/news/georgia-sc ... oting-gun/
During a May 2023 investigation into online threats of a shooting, local police spoke with the suspect's father, who said he, the father, owned hunting rifles but the teen did not have unsupervised access to them, according to incident reports obtained by CBS News.
If the legal authorities who investigated the kid did not find probable cause to continue the investigation or to take any action related to the threat, the neither the father nor the kid should lose their constitutional right.