This is the post that started our back and forth. Even though it was an attempted diversion from the OP of this thread, it is the subject of our conversation. I understand, because you're a whiny *** liberal who's assertion (above) is disproven by facts posted by me (the actual verdict form from the trial) and a post by you (a filing by Kaplan in which he clearly states Carroll failed to prevail in her assertion Trump committed rape), you need to divert this back-and-forth to the civil penalties, an opinion by Kaplan in a news article or the reason Kaplan made the filing that proves you wrong.
However, just in case it hasn't become clear to you, I am not willing to participate in your attempted redirection. If you care to find an official court verdict or filing that states Trump committed rape as defined by the law at the time of the incident, I will be more than happy to continue. Note that generally accepted definitions that go against the definition contained in the law at the time of the incident will be categorically dismissed as irrelevant as will anything in an opinion piece not supported by the law at the time of the incident.
I will await such information from you. Until that time, I have nothing more to say than you are constantly demonstrating you are the typical liberal who has no interest in legal fact when party talking points make you feel better about you lies.