User avatar
ConsRule
12 Nov 2024 7:07 pm
User avatar
     
3,376 posts
Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 5:54 pm » wrote: ↑ Let's simplify this...

The jury determined that Grifty had digitally penetrated her....that is defined, broadly, as rape.

Grifty, having assumed the role of Active Party to such an event, can be rightfully called by the same name as the lowliest private in the armies under his command accused of the same act.
 
 But not according to the laws of NY at the time of the incident or the trial.  That is why the jury verdict says Trump did not commit rape.

You can use your own definition to whine...but the official verdict in the trial had to follow the law. 

1 Did Ms Carroll prove, by a preponderance of the evidence, that Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll?  Jury answered no.
 
Updated 3 minutes ago
© 2012-2026 Liberal Forum

Search