Blackvegetable » 12 Nov 2024, 8:16 pm » wrote: ↑
THIS IS A CIVIL CASE.
He is not being CONVICTED of rape, he is being found liable for digitally penetrating a non consenting party. Digital penetration is broadly, and now even in NY, considered rape.
This is why it is entirely appropriate to call Grifty a rapist. It is how you refer to a digital penetrator who dispenses with consent.
Just read the filing, Pilgrim.
I don't give a **** if it's a case of beer. And the filing is completely irrelevant. Once again, my assertion...WHICH IS FACT...is that no jury, in any court anywhere on earth has found that Trump committed rape.
You not being mature enough to accept that doesn't change the verdict of the jury.