4 Jan 2025 5:32 pm
Again...employees of the contractor ARE NOT employees of Trump. Besides, an attempt to file a lien by the employees of a contractor would be quickly rejected. They have no standing (or grounds) to file the lien, much less against someone who isn't their employer.Blackvegetable » 04 Jan 2025, 5:23 pm » wrote: ↑ You never read the citation.
Again.
The men were putting in 12-hour shifts with inadequate safety equipment at subpar wages that their contractor paid sporadically, if at all. A lawyer for many of the Poles demanded that the workers be paid or else he would serve Trump with a lien on the property. One Polish worker even went to Trump’s office to ask him for money in person, according to sworn testimony and a deposition filed under oath in a court case.
For help, Trump turned to Daniel Sullivan, a 6-ft. 5-in., 285-lb. labor consultant, FBI informant and future officer of the Teamsters Union. “Donald told me he had difficulties …,” Sullivan later testified in the case. “That he had some illegal Polish employees on the job.”
Why don't you read the evidence, and skip the plausible deniability routine, Toady.