10 Jan 2025 3:55 pm
That is why there were "experts" saying the law is unconstitutional while the trial was in process. Since Trump is the only person to be prosecuted under this law, someone now has legal standing to challenge it's constitutionality.*Beekeeper » 10 Jan 2025, 4:29 pm » wrote: ↑ The FIRST challenge will be the FAILURE of Merchan to require a unanimous verdict on the "underlying crime" that Bragg used to make it a felony!! This is COUNT 1 of violation of the Constitutional rights of a defendant.
Because NO EVIDENCE was introduced to PROVE any "underlying crime" happened NOR was any "underlying crime' even introduced in an indictment OR during the trial. Merchan SHOULD have completely dismissed this case based on that alone, but his HATE OF TRUMP clouded his mind and judgement. The US Constitution REQUIRES that element of a impartiality happen or it's a TOTAL **** trial!!
And the NEXT one will be Merchan donating to DEMOCRAT CANDIDATES and that is a TOTAL prohibition in NY STATE LAW!!
The list goes on and on, but that's 3 MAJOR defects in this case that WILL result in a complete DISMISSAL of this "conviction" and a TOSSING of the verdict by either the NY State Supreme court or the SCOTUS if it gets to them.