22 Feb 2023 8:05 am
That would depend on how someone presents the other person. If they are making the claim the person they are agreeing with/quoting/referring to is a recognized scholar on the subject, be it any field of science, economic issues, the Constitution, etc., then cherry picking their positions in that subject matter is hypocritical (IMO).maineman » 22 Feb 2023, 8:56 am » wrote: ↑ Do you think it is "incorrect" for someone to agree with another person some of the time and disagree with them at other times? And if so, is it appropriate to use the issues one agrees with to bolster an argument one is having and not be compelled to stand behind the author on each and every issue past/present and in the future?