9 Apr 2026 9:37 am
If the best defense of an unverified claim is ‘BUT FOX,’ that tells me you’ve got nothing. The sourcing is still garbage. The story is still unverified. And Google still comes up empty. When your argument is so weak you have to drag in an unrelated network just to feel something, that’s when you know the Slack‑Jaw look is setting in.Blackvegetable » 09 Apr 2026, 9:30 am » wrote: ↑ No....I found
Not obliged to pay both, or either, for lying....you're probably thinking of FOX...it's for morons.
and
https://zeteo.com/p/trump-jeffrey-epste ... -blackmail
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.