19 Apr 2026 9:44 am
National security risk.....was never a finding. It never appeared as a conclusion in Mueller’s findings, The IG report, The Durham report, or any official DOJ statement. Not one official report concluded Trump was a ‘Russian asset.’ So, as usual, you are a **** LIAR.Blackvegetable » 19 Apr 2026, 9:23 am » wrote: ↑ There was no "Russia Russia Hoax'....there was an investigation concluding that the Russian asset, for whom you cast 3 enthusiastic votes, was a national security risk......
I could have told them that for a fine dining experience
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.