19 Apr 2026 10:19 am
Your BBC link is a 2020 article reporting on one FBI official’s opinion, not a DOJ conclusion. The article itself admits Mueller did not establish conspiracy, did not conclude Trump was compromised, and did not label him a national security risk.
And it predates the IG Report and the Durham Report — both of which found the FBI relied on unverified intelligence and never concluded Trump was a Russian asset. A BBC write‑up about someone’s opinion is not an official finding. You’re trying to replace actual DOJ reports with punditry and headlines. That’s not evidence.
All of this makes you a **** LIAR as usual. You have nothing. It's time I place your LYING *** on ignore. I hate LIARS.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.