23 May 2026 11:27 am
It was official. It was public. It was NOAA HQ. It backed Trump’s wording. Everything else is context, not erasure. NOAA’s own investigations proved the statement was pressured, but pressured or not, NOAA HQ still issued it backing Trump, and that’s the part you keep pretending didn’t happen. NOAA backed TRUMP....say it BITCH.
So, let's recap the Ignorance here...shall we.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.
BV posted...Only the zealously stupid, like zeet and a few other local dim lights, believe that 1.87 has any meaning beyond the symbolic. Supply/Demand stooges who believe POTUS can control oil prices.........
Then he posted....Grifty was the entire reason gas went to 4.50 this year.